Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curatron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Curatron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No actual information about the topic, which is not notable itself. CoolieCoolster (talk) 00:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do check out the version in the history here, which was blanked on 4 March. It still may not be notable but that is what we should be looking at. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think the older version of the article is notable either. Acnetj (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for distinct lack of notability; also, possibly so as not to run afoul of that warning about the trade mark! -The Gnome (talk) 19:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.